\documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsfonts, amsthm, amsmath, stmaryrd} \setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0in} \setlength{\textheight}{8.5in} \setlength{\topmargin}{0in} \setlength{\headheight}{0in} \setlength{\headsep}{0in} \setlength{\parskip}{0pt} \setlength{\parindent}{20pt} \def\CC{\mathbb{C}} \def\FF{\mathbb{F}} \def\NN{\mathbb{N}} \def\PP{\mathbb{P}} \def\QQ{\mathbb{Q}} \def\RR{\mathbb{R}} \def\ZZ{\mathbb{Z}} \def\gotha{\mathfrak{a}} \def\gothm{\mathfrak{m}} \def\gotho{\mathfrak{o}} \def\gothp{\mathfrak{p}} \DeclareMathOperator{\Disc}{Disc} \DeclareMathOperator{\Trace}{Trace} \DeclareMathOperator{\Norm}{Norm} \def\bv{\vec{v}} \def\bw{\vec{w}} \def\head#1{\medskip \noindent \textbf{#1}.} \def\fixme#1{\textbf{FIXME! #1}} \DeclareMathOperator{\Vol}{Vol} \begin{document} \begin{center} \bf Math 254A, UC Berkeley, Fall 2001 (Kedlaya) \\ Problem Set 7: Local Fields/Ramification \\ Due \emph{in Frank Calegari's mailbox} Monday, October 15 \end{center} This week only: please make any extension requests directly to Frank. His email is \texttt{fcale@math.berkeley.edu}. Please submit seven of the following problems. \head{Jargon watch} Given a field $K$ and a fixed exponential valuation on $K$, the \emph{value group} is the image of the exponential valuation in $\RR$. A field with a discrete valuation is called \emph{henselian} if the statement of Hensel's Lemma holds over the field, whether or not the field is complete. For the purposes of this problem set, you may use the fact that a field $K$ is henselian if and only if the following weak form of Hensel's Lemma is true: if $P(x)$ is a polynomial over the valuation ring $R$ of $K$ and $\alpha$ is a simple root of $P$ over the residue field of $R$, then there is a root of $P$ in $R$ that reduces to $\alpha$. See Section~II.6 for more on henselian fields. Throughout the set, let $\zeta_n$ denote an $n$-th root of unity. \head{More on local fields} \begin{enumerate} \item Determine all of the quadratic extensions of $\QQ_p$. (Your answer will have a different form for $p=2$.) \item Determine the degree of $\QQ_p(\zeta_n)$ over $\QQ_p$, for $p$ a prime not dividing $n$. \item Let $K$ be the maximal unramified extension of $\QQ_p$. Prove that $K$ is henselian. (Hint: reduce to a finite extension of $\QQ_p$.) \item Let $R$ be the ring of power series over $\CC$ that converge in some neighborhood of 0. Prove that the fraction field of $R$ is henselian. \item Neukirch II.6.1 (modified): Let $f(x) = x^n + \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} f_i x^i$ be a monic polynomial of degree $n$ over a local field $K$, which factors completely over $K$ with roots $r_1, \dots, r_n$. Prove that for any $\epsilon>0$, there exists $\delta>0$ such that if $g(x) = x^n + \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} g_i x^i$ is a monic polynomial of degree $n$ such that $|f_i-g_i| < \delta$, then $g$ has $n$ roots $s_1, \dots, s_n$ in $K$, which can be labeled so that $|r_i-s_i| < \epsilon$ for $i=1, \dots, n$. That is, the roots of $f$ vary continuously with the coefficients. \end{enumerate} \head{Ramification} \begin{enumerate} \item Prove that a finite extension of $\QQ_p$ has only one unramified extension of any given degree. (Hint: recall that a finite field has only one extension of any given degree.) \item Show that $\QQ_p(\zeta_{p}) = \QQ_p(\pi)$ for $\pi$ a $(p-1)$-st root of $-p$. (Hint: both extensions are tamely ramified.) \item Neukirch II.7.1: The maximal unramified extension of $\QQ_p$ is obtained by adjoining all roots of unity of order prime to $p$. \item Neukirch II.7.3: Let $K$ be a local field and $L/K$ a totally and tamely ramified extension, and let $\Gamma$ and $\Delta$ be the value groups of $K$ and $L$, respectively. Show that the subfields of $L$ containing $K$ are in one-to-one correspondence with the subgroups of $\Delta/\Gamma$. \item Let $P(x)$ be a monic irreducible polynomial over $\ZZ_p$. Suppose the discriminant of $P(x)$ is not divisible by $p$. Prove that the field $\QQ_p[x]/(P(x))$ is unramified over $\ZZ_p$. \item For $p$ odd, prove that $\QQ_p(\zeta_n)$ is ramified over $\QQ_p$ if and only if $p$ divides $n$. Optional: what happens if $p=2$? (Hint: see the end of Section~II.7.) \end{enumerate} \end{document}